4.2 Article

The Myocardial Accumulation of Aggregated Desmin Protein in a Case of Desminopathy with a de novo DES p.R406W Mutation

期刊

INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 62, 期 19, 页码 2883-2887

出版社

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0992-22

关键词

desminopathy; sporadic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; proteinase K-resistant desmin aggregation; myocardial biopsy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Desminopathy is a cardiac and skeletal myopathy caused by disease-causing variants in the DES gene. In this report, we describe a 28-year-old Japanese patient who was initially diagnosed with sporadic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with atrioventricular block and developed weakness in the soft palate and extremities. Genetic testing confirmed a de novo mutation of the DES gene. The challenging molecular diagnosis of desminopathy makes the pathological findings of endomyocardial proteinase K-resistant desmin aggregates helpful in clinical practice.
Desminopathy is a cardiac and skeletal myopathy caused by disease-causing variants in the desmin (DES) gene and represents a subgroup of myofibrillar myopathies, where cytoplasmic desmin-postive immunoreactivity is the pathological hallmark. We herein report a 28-year-old Japanese man who was initially diagnosed with sporadic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with atrioventricular block at 9 years old and developed weakness in the soft palate and extremities. The myocardial tissue dissected during implantation of the ventricularassisted device showed a dilated phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and intracellular accumulation of proteinase K-resistant desmin aggregates. Genetic testing confirmed a de novo mutation of DES, which has already been linked to desminopathy. As the molecular diagnosis of desminopathy is challenging, particularly if patients show predominantly cardiac signs and a routine skeletal muscle biopsy is unavailable, these characteristic pathological findings of endomyocardial proteinase K-resistant desmin aggregates might aid in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据