4.7 Article

Hydration of Propargyl Esters Catalyzed by Gold(I) Complexes with Phosphoramidite Calix[4]pyrrole Cavitands as Ligands

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 62, 期 45, 页码 18697-18706

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03089

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis and characterization of two diastereomeric phosphoramidite calix[4]pyrrole cavitands and their corresponding gold(I) complexes. The catalytic activity of these complexes in the hydration reaction of propargyl esters was studied. The presence of polar hydrogen bond acceptor groups in the substrate was found to decrease the hydration rate constants, possibly due to coordination competition with the Au(I) metal center of the catalysts.
We report the synthesis and characterization of two diastereomeric phosphoramidite calix[4]pyrrole cavitands and their corresponding gold(I) complexes, 2(in)center dot Au(I)center dot Cl and 2(out)center dot Au(I)center dot Cl, featuring the metal center directed inward and outward with respect to their aromatic cavity. We studied the catalytic activity of the complexes in the hydration of a series of propargyl esters as the benchmarking reaction. All substrates were equipped with a six-membered ring substituent either lacking or including a polar group featuring different hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) capabilities. We designed the substrates with the polar group to form 1:1 inclusion complexes of different stabilities with the catalysts. In the case of 2(in)center dot Au(I)center dot OTf, the 1:1 complex placed the alkynyl group of the bound substrate close to the metal center. We compared the obtained results with those of a model phosphoramidite gold(I) complex lacking a calix[4]pyrrole cavity. We found that for all catalysts, the presence of an increasingly polar HBA group in the substrate provoked a decrease in the hydration rate constants. We attributed this result to the competing coordination of the HBA group of the substrate for the Au(I) metal center of the catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据