4.2 Article

The impact of manganese on biofilm development of Bacillus subtilis

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 162, 期 8, 页码 1468-1478

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000320

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Sklodowska Curie career integration grant (PheHetBacBiofilm)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KO4741/2-1, KO4741/3-1]
  3. Jena School for Microbial Communications (JSMC)
  4. International Max Planck Research School
  5. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia-German Academic Exchange Service (CONACyT-DAAD)
  6. Erasmus scholarship in Groningen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial biofilms are dynamic and structurally complex communities, involving cell-to-cell interactions. In recent years, various environmental signals that induce the complex biofilm development of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis have been identified. These signalling molecules are often media components or molecules produced by the cells themselves, as well as those of other interacting species. The responses can also be due to depletion of certain molecules in the vicinity of the cells. Extracellular manganese (Mn2+) is essential for proper biofilm development of B. subtilis. Mn2+ is also a component of practically all laboratory biofilm-promoting media used for B. subtilis. Comparison of complex colony biofilms in the presence or absence of supplemented Mn2+ using microarray analyses revealed that genes involved in biofilm formation are indeed downregulated in the absence of Mn2+. In addition, Mn2+ also affects the transcription of several other genes involved in distinct differentiation pathways of various cellular processes. The effects of Mn2+ on other biofilm-related traits like motility, antimicrobial production, stress and sporulation were followed using fluorescent reporter strains. The global transcriptome and morphology studies highlight the importance of Mn2+ during biofilm development and provide an overview on the expressional changes in colony biofilms in B. subtilis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据