4.5 Article

Job satisfaction in agile information systems development: A stakeholder perspective

期刊

INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107289

关键词

Agile information systems development; Software engineering; Internal stakeholder; Job satisfaction; Mixed-methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agile ISD practices can enhance stakeholders' job satisfaction by promoting perceived meaningfulness and interaction frequency. This study provides evidence that collaboration between team members and stakeholders is crucial in achieving job satisfaction in agile ISD.
Context: Agile information systems development (ISD) claims to increase employees' job satisfaction. While previous research acknowledged increased job satisfaction among team members such as software developers, less attention has been paid to stakeholders in agile ISD. Furthermore, we lack evidence about the role of review meetings between team members and stakeholders. Objective: With the aim to tackle those current shortcomings, we set out to gain a deeper understanding on how agile ISD practices affect internal stakeholders' job satisfaction (SJS). Method: Using a mixed methods approach, we identify predictors of SJS in an exploratory case study first. Second, we develop our theoretical model that was evaluated with a survey of agile ISD stakeholders. Results: Findings of conditional process analysis show that agile practices positively affect SJS via perceived meaningfulness and interaction frequency. Our results provide evidence that collaboration between team members and stakeholders is crucial for enhancing SJS. Conclusions: We conclude that agile ISD practices have a positive effect on SJS. These findings have several implications for theory and offer a foundation for future research on stakeholders in agile ISD. Practical implications refer to the establishment of agile practices, meaningfulness at work and awareness for agile transformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据