4.7 Article

Performance of nanofibrillated cellulose with chitosan as a wet-end additive for paper applications

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117219

关键词

Papermaking; Wet-end additives; Nanofibrillated cellulose; Chitosan; Physical properties; Mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate the effect of incorporating nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and chitosan (CH) as dry additives during papermaking for unbleached bamboo alkaline sulfite anthraquinone methanol (ASAM). The results showed that the addition of nanofibrillated cellulose and chitosan significantly altered the physical and mechanical strength of the paper.
The aim of this work is to evaluate of the effect of incorporating nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and chitosan (CH) in a dual system as dry additives during papermaking for unbleached bamboo alkaline sulfite anthraquinone methanol (ASAM) under different beating revolutions. Pulp beating at 4000 and 6000 revolutions has comparable properties with varying dosages of NFC (5% and 10%) and different chitosan concentrations (0.5%, 1, 1.5%, and 2%). Hand sheets of a basis weight (60 g/cm2) were produced and measured for thickness, tear, tensile, burst index, and resistance to folding under TAPPI standard methods. Results revealed that with an increase in the number of beating revolutions, there was a decrease in the value of freeness. All analyzed pulp had freeness values within the permissible amount of 300-500 mL in papermaking, except 10% NFC, which was 244-190 mL at 6000 revolutions. Furthermore, the addition of chitosan to 1.5% with 5% NFC at 6000 beating revolutions enhanced the tensile index (85.16 Nm/g) and burst index (7.69 kPa. m2/g) in comparison to the sample control. The incorporation of nanofibrillated cellulose and chitosan significantly altered the physical and mechanical strength. Optimal alkaline sulfite anthraquinone methanol ASAM-enhanced paper properties are displayed with 5% NFC and 1.5% chitosan at 6000 beating revolutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据