4.6 Article

Measurement of Three-Phase Holdup Distribution in Gas-Liquid-Solid Fluidized Bed Based on ERT/TMR-EMT

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 35, 页码 14100-14110

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01772

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The measurement of three-phase holdup distributions in the gas-liquid-solid fluidized bed is important for the characterization, design, and optimization of the fluidized bed. This study proposes an image reconstruction method based on electrical resistance tomography and electromagnetic tomography to simultaneously measure the three-phase holdup distribution. The results show that the reconstructed image and three-phase average holdup accurately reflect the variations in gas, liquid, and solid content, providing valuable information for the fluidized bed experiments.
The measurement of three-phase holdup distributions in the gas-liquid-solid fluidized bed has guiding significance for the fluidized bed's characterization, design, and optimization. Aimed at the measurement of three-phase holdup distribution simultaneously, an image reconstruction method for electrical resistance tomography and electromagnetic tomography based on tunnel magnetoresistance (ERT/TMR-EMT) dual-modality system is proposed. The distributions of equivalent conductivity and equivalent permeability are reconstructed by the D-bar algorithm based on ERT and TMR-EMT, respectively. Then, the three-phase holdup distribution is reconstructed through equivalent media theory. From the results of the reconstructed image and three-phase average holdup in simulation, the holdup variations of the gas, liquid, and solid are principally consistent with the phantom sets. From the measurement results of the dynamic experiments, clusters with high solid holdup and bubbles with high gas holdup can be accurately reflected and the variation of three-phase holdup distribution and average holdup can correctly reflect changes in experimental states in the fluidized bed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据