4.5 Article

Autoinducer-2 of quorum sensing is involved in cell damage caused by avian pathogenic Escherichia coli

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 247-252

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.08.033

关键词

Autoinducer-2; Quorum sensing; Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli; Cell damage; Chicken type II pneumocyte

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31372470]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation [2014T70297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) infections are responsible for great losses in the poultry industry. Quorum sensing (QS) acts as a global regulatory system that controls genes involved in bacterial pathogenesis, metabolism and protein biosynthesis. However, whether QS of APEC is related to cell damage has not been elucidated. In the present study, we explored the correlation between the damage of chicken type II pneumocytes induced by APEC and the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) activity of APEC. The results showed that when chicken type II pneumocytes were co-cultured with 10(8) CFU/ml of APEC-O78 for 6 h, the release of LDH reached the highest level (192.5 +/- 13.4 U/L) (P < 0.01), and the percentages of dead cells followed the same trend in trypan blue exclusion assay. In addition, the AI-2 activity of cell free culture fluid (CF) reached the maximum value after 6 h co-culture with 10(8) CFU/ml of APEC-O78. At the same time, the mRNA expressions of eight virulence genes (papC, fimA, fimC, hlyE, ompA, luxS, pfs, and qseA) of 10(8) CFU/ml APEC-O78 were significantly increased compared with those of 107 CFU/ml, and the mRNA expressions of four virulence genes (hlyE, tsh, iss, and luxS) of 10(8) CFU/ml APEC-O78 were higher than those of 10(9) CFU/ml (p < 0.05) after incubation for 6 h. These results suggested that AI-2-mediated QS is involved in the cell damage induced by APEC-O78, indicating AI-2 may be one new potential target for preventing chicken colibacillosis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据