4.4 Article

RGB depth salient object detection via cross-modal attention and boundary feature guidance

期刊

IET COMPUTER VISION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/cvi2.12244

关键词

computer vision; image processing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An end-to-end framework for RGB-D salient object detection (SOD) is proposed, which includes multiple modules for feature enhancement, contextual feature interaction, boundary feature extraction, and boundary attention guidance. The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art RGB-D SOD models on multiple evaluation metrics.
RGB depth (RGB-D) salient object detection (SOD) is a meaningful and challenging task, which has achieved good detection performance in dealing with simple scenes using convolutional neural networks, however, it cannot effectively handle scenes with complex contours of salient objects or similarly coloured salient objects and background. A novel end-to-end framework is proposed for RGB-D SOD, which comprises of four main components: the cross-modal attention feature enhancement (CMAFE) module, the multi-level contextual feature interaction (MLCFI) module, the boundary feature extraction (BFE) module, and the multi-level boundary attention guidance (MLBAG) module. The CMAFE module retains the more effective salient features by employing a dual-attention mechanism to filter noise from two modalities. In the MLCFI module, a shuffle operation is used for high-level and low-level channels to promote cross-channel information communication, and rich semantic information is extracted. The BFE module converts salient features into boundary features to generate boundary maps. The MLBAG module produces saliency maps by aggregating multi-level boundary saliency maps to guide cross-modal features in the decode stage. Extensive experiments are conducted on six public benchmark datasets, with the results demonstrating that the proposed model significantly outperforms 23 state-of-the-art RGB-D SOD models with regards to multiple evaluation metrics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据