4.3 Article

A BER formula of OTFS modulation with message-passing receiver

期刊

IET COMMUNICATIONS
卷 17, 期 15, 页码 1820-1828

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/cmu2.12656

关键词

bit error rate (BER); message-passing; orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the bit error rate (BER) formula of orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation with message-passing (MP) receiver over doubly selective fading channel. The equivalent signal models of the MP receiver are defined, and the expression of the signal-noise-ratio (SNR) is derived. The probability distribution function of the SNR is estimated by assuming a lognormal distribution, and the parameters of the distribution function are estimated. Finally, the formula for calculating the BER of OTFS modulation with MP receiver is obtained and verified through simulations.
The orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation is a promising multicarrier waveform which can have good performance in high-mobility scenarios. Among various receivers designed for the OTFS modulation, the message-passing (MP) receiver has received much attention which can achieve a good bit error rate (BER) performance. However, the BER performance of MP receiver is usually obtained through simulations due to the lack of corresponding BER formula in the literature. This work studies the BER formula of OTFS modulation with MP receiver over doubly selective fading channel. Specifically, equivalent signal models of the MP receiver are first defined and the expression of the corresponding signal-noise-ratio (SNR) is derived, then the probability distribution function of the SNR is estimated by assuming the distribution of SNR as a lognormal distribution, then the methods to estimate the parameters of the distribution function are proposed, and finally the formula for calculating the BER of the OTFS modulation with MP receiver is obtained. Simulation results verify that the proposed BER formula is accurate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据