4.7 Article

Broadcast Secrecy Rate Maximization in UAV-Empowered IRS Backscatter Communications

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 6445-6458

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2023.3243270

关键词

Unmanned aerial vehicle; intelligent reflecting surface; backscatter communication; broadcast secrecy rate; reinforcement learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a UAV-empowered IRS-BackCom network that addresses the issues of double-fading effect and eavesdropping, while ensuring secure transmission and maximizing the broadcast secrecy rate.
The backscatter communications (BackCom) and physical layer security are respected to realize extremely low-power secure communications in the imminent sixth generation (6G). In a BackCom system, the backscatter device without radio frequency components sends messages to users by reflecting the external signals. However, the double-fading effect limits BackCom's performance and the commonly used broadcast mode is vulnerable to eavesdropping. Two promising technologies, intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), show excellent potential in handling these problems. In this paper, we propose a UAV-empowered IRS-BackCom network, where an IRS acts as the backscatter device and uses the received signals from a UAV for BackCom. We aim to guarantee secure transmission and maximize the broadcast secrecy rate by jointly optimizing the UAV's beamformer and trajectory and the IRS's reflection coefficient. To tackle the non-convex problem, we leverage the block coordinate descent method to decompose it into three subproblems. Specifically, the UAV's beamformer and trajectory and the IRS's reflection matrix are optimized alternatively. Further, we adopt reinforcement learning to facilitate the intractable UAV's trajectory optimization. Simulation results verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed system model and the optimization scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据