4.7 Article

Transferable Deep Kernel Emulator for Probabilistic Load Margin Assessment With Topology Changes, Uncertain Renewable Generations and Loads

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 5740-5754

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3231240

关键词

Voltage stability; uncertain resources; probabilistic load margin assessment; deep kernel emulator; transfer learning; power system stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a probabilistic transferable deep kernel emulator (DKE) to address the voltage stability challenges caused by stochastic renewable generation and flexible loads. The emulator combines the advantages of deep neural network (DNN) and Gaussian process for uncertainty quantification and achieves high accuracy in load margin assessment.
The increasing uncertainties caused by the high-penetration of stochastic renewable generation resources and flexible loads pose challenges to the power system voltage stability. To address this issue, this paper proposes a probabilistic transferable deep kernel emulator (DKE) to extract the hidden relationship between uncertain sources, i.e., wind generations and loads, and load margin for probabilistic load margin assessment (PLMA). This emulator extends the Gaussian process kernel to the deep neural network (DNN) structure and thus gains the advantages of DNN in dealing with high-dimension uncertain inputs and the uncertainty quantification capability of the Gaussian process. A transfer learning framework is also developed to reduce the invariant representation space distance between the old topology and new one. It allows the DKE to be quickly fine tuned with only a few samples under the new topology. Numerical results carried out on the modified IEEE 39-bus and 118-bus power systems demonstrate the strong robustness of the proposed transferable DKE to uncertain wind and load power as well as topology changes while maintaining high accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据