4.8 Article

Shunt Active Power Filter Based on Savitzky-Golay Filter: Pragmatic Modelling and Performance Validation

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 38, 期 7, 页码 8838-8850

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3258457

关键词

Grid frequency; harmonics elimination; phase-locked loop (PLL); power electronics; Savitzky-Golay filter (SGF); shunt active power filter (SAPF); synchronization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a novel reference current generation technique based on the Savitzky-Golay filter (SGF) for shunt active power filter (SAPF). It can generate a harmonic-free fundamental reference current that can improve the overall harmonic profile and performance compared to existing SAPFs.
This article introduces a novel reference current generation technique based on the Savitzky-Golay filter (SGF) for shunt active power filter (SAPF). Although the existing and conventional SAPF can mitigate harmonics under grid disturbances and nonlinear load environments, they have numerous performance deficiencies including computational complexity, average filtration ability, and slow dynamic response. The proposed SAPF based on SGF can generate a harmonic-free fundamental reference current that can eventually improve the overall harmonic profile and performance compared to existing SAPFs. In addition, an SGF-based phase-locked loop (PLL) is introduced to generate reference phases directly fromthe distorted grid voltages by retaining the fundamental information of the signal. Thus, it does not induce any phase delay or distortions in the output, unlike the conventional PLLs utilized in the SAPFs. Comparative analysis of performance evaluation is carried outwith other SAPFs, and the findings represent the principal achievements of this article. This includes a substantial improvement in performance and harmonic profile under transient conditions. The results are further validated through simulation analysis and hardware implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据