4.2 Article

Antimicrobial Drug Resistance and Molecular Typing of Salmonella enterica Serovar Rissen from Different Sources

期刊

MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 211-217

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2015.0161

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacion para el Fomento en Asturias de la Investigacion Cientifica Aplicada y la Tecnologia [FICYTBP11-050, FICYTBP09-069]
  2. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain [FIS-PI11-00808]
  3. European Regional Development Fund of the European Union: a way to Making Europe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salmonella enterica serovar Rissen is one of the most common serovars found in pigs and pork products in different countries, including Spain. However, information on the molecular bases of antimicrobial drug resistance and the population structure of Salmonella Rissen from different sources in Spain is limited. The present study focused on 84 isolates collected in Spain from pig and beef carcasses, foods and clinical samples associated with sporadic cases of gastroenteritis, and one outbreak. The majority of the isolates were resistant to tetracycline (73.8%), mainly conferred by tet(A). Resistances to streptomycin (aadA1-like, aadA2, and strAB), sulfonamides (sul1, sul2, and sul3), trimethoprim (dfrA1-like and dfrA12), ampicillin (bla(TEM-1-like)), and chloramphenicol (cmlA1-like) were also detected, with frequencies ranging from 12% to 20.2%. Most of the identified genes were carried by integrons, including three class 1 integrons of the sul1 type, a class 1 integron of the sul3 type, and the class 2 integron of Tn7. Two sul1 integrons, the sul3 integron, and the class 2 integron are first reported in Salmonella Rissen. Typing of the isolates with XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis detected a major clone, which was circulating in humans and animals during the past decade, and was responsible for the outbreak. The obtained results are relevant for food safety and public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据