4.7 Article

A Task-Driven Sequential Overlapping Coalition Formation Game for Resource Allocation in Heterogeneous UAV Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 4439-4455

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2022.3165965

关键词

Unmanned aerial vehicle; overlapping coalition formation game; task and resource allocation; sequential task execution schedule

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sequential overlapping coalition formation game model is proposed to optimize the composition and task allocation of heterogeneous UAVs. The model considers the overlapping and complementary relations of resource properties and the task execution order, and introduces a bilateral mutual benefit transfer order to allocate task resources more efficiently.
A heterogeneous unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) network where UAVs carrying different resources form coalition and cooperatively carry out tasks is of crucial importance for fulfilling diverse tasks. However, the existing coalition formation (CF) game model only optimizes the composition of UAVs in a single coalition, which results in disjoined coalitions. In order to tackle this issue, a sequential overlapping coalition formation (OCF) game is proposed by considering the overlapping and complementary relations of resource properties and the task execution order. Moreover, different from the Pareto and selfish orders, a bilateral mutual benefit transfer (BMBT) order is proposed to optimize the cooperative task resource allocation through partial cooperation among overlapping coalition members. Furthermore, using the preference relation between UAVs carrying resources and tasks requiring the same type of resource, a preference gravity-guided tabu search (PGG-TS) algorithm is developed to obtain a stable coalition structure. Numerical results verify that the proposed PGG-TS algorithm increases the average utility of tasks by 12.5% and 38.5% compared with the split-merge preferred OCF algorithm and non-overlapping CF algorithm, respectively. The utility of the proposed BMBT order increases by 25.1% and 34.3% compared with selfish and Pareto orders, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据