4.8 Article

Laplace Distribution Based Online Identification of Linear Systems With Robust Recursive Expectation-Maximization Algorithm

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 9028-9036

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3225026

关键词

Gaussian distribution; Pollution measurement; Bayes methods; Approximation algorithms; Linear systems; Heuristic algorithms; Informatics; Laplace distribution; linear systems; online identification; robust recursive expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article addresses the robust online identification problem of linear systems using a faster robust recursive expectation-maximization (RREM) framework. To accelerate convergence, outliers are modeled by a Laplace distribution instead of Student's t-distribution. The recursive transformation of the maximum likelihood function is achieved using a recursive Q-function. The proposed approach is tested on a simulated continuous fermentation reactor system example and a coupled-tank experiment.
The robust online identification problem of linear systems is considered in this article using a faster robust recursive expectation-maximization (RREM) framework. To improve the convergence rate, the outliers, which would deteriorate the identified models, are accommodated with a Laplace distribution instead of Student's $t$-distribution. Then, the recursive transformation of the maximum likelihood function is realized with a recursive $Q$-function. The extensively recognized autoregressive exogenous (ARX) models are used for the description of general linear systems. As a result, the unknown parameters, including the regression coefficient vector of the ARX models, the variance of the noise without outliers, and the scale parameter of the Laplace distribution, are determined in a recursive manner. The performance of the proposed approach is tested with a simulated continuous fermentation reactor system example and a coupled-tank experiment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据