4.5 Article

BlockExplorer: Exploring Blockchain Big Data Via Parallel Processing

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 2377-2389

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2023.3248280

关键词

Blockchain; distributed system; ethereum; security and privacy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces BlockExplorer, an efficient and flexible blockchain exploration system for Ethereum. BlockExplorer utilizes a master-slave architecture, transaction-based partitioning, and code instrumentation to achieve data balance and complete data acquisition, accelerating data retrieval speed and detecting Ethereum attacks within a short time.
Today's blockchain systems store detailed runtime information in the format of transactions and blocks, which are valuable not only to understand the finance of blockchain-based ecosystems but also to audit the security of on-chain applications. However, exploring this blockchain Big Data is challenging due to data heterogeneity and the huge amount. Existing blockchain exploration techniques are either incomplete or inefficient, making them inapt in time-sensitive applications. This paper presents BlockExplorer, an efficient and flexible blockchain exploration system for Ethereum. BlockExplorer builds on a master-slave architecture, where the master partitions all blocks into multiple non-overlapped sets and each slave simultaneously processes Ethereum Big Data based on a set of blocks. BlockExplorer implements a transaction-based partitioning approach to address load balance among slaves, and a code instrumentation approach to acquire complete Ethereum Big Data. The evaluation shows that BlockExplorer accelerates the data acquisition performance of the state-of-the-art by 4.1x, while the workload difference among slaves is up to 18%. To demonstrate the application of BlockExplorer, we develop three apps upon BlockExplorer to detect real-life attacks against Ethereum and show that our apps can detect attacks in a large range of blocks (e.g., ten million) within a short time (e.g., multiple hours).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据