4.7 Article

Relay-Aided Based Physical Layer Security in VLC System With Improved Noise Model

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
卷 71, 期 7, 页码 4193-4203

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2023.3277035

关键词

Improved VLC channel; trusted cooperative relay; physical layer security; superposition coding; secrecy rate region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates a visible light communication (VLC) system with an improved noise model applied to physical layer security (PLS), using secure beamforming signals with superposition coding. The improved model ensures that the output signal follows a signal-dependent Gaussian distribution. Two different methods are proposed to obtain lower and upper bounds on the secrecy rate of the strong user in direct transmission. Closed-form expressions for the lower and upper bounds on secrecy rate regions for various relaying schemes are derived, considering constraints and scenarios of blockage/outside coverage. The results show that the lower and upper bounds on secrecy rate regions are tight, and cooperative jamming outperforms other relaying schemes.
A visible light communication (VLC) system with an improved noise model applied to physical layer security (PLS) is investigated, where secure beamforming signals with superposition coding are used. In the improved model, the output signal follows Gaussian distribution, but its variance is signal-dependent. Two different methods are proposed to obtain lower and upper bounds on the secrecy rate of the strong user for direct transmission. Under some constraints, closed-form expressions of the lower and upper bounds on secrecy rate regions for various (trusted cooperative half-duplex) relaying schemes are derived. Moreover, the scenarios of blockage/outside coverage are included, and the relevant security performances are discussed. Numerical results show that the lower and upper bounds on secrecy rate regions are tight enough, and the cooperative jamming is superior over other relaying schemes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据