4.4 Article

Pulse Field Magnetization (PFM) With Sectioned HTS Stacked Tape Structures for Electrical Machine

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2023.3251295

关键词

High-temperature superconductors; Superconducting magnets; Magnetization; Superconducting films; Magnetic flux; Rotors; Mathematical models; Finite element analysis; high-temperature superconductors; Index Terms; pulse field magnetization; superconducting electrical ma-chines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigates substitutions for wider tapes in superconducting electrical machines. Different stack architectures and substrate materials are tested for their magnetizing effect using pulse field magnetization. Sectioned stacks are tested in a modified synchronous machine under liquid nitrogen conditions to explore the characteristics of trapped flux, magnetization, and demagnetization.
High temperature superconducting (HTS) stacks of superconducting tapes provide a solution for all-superconducting electrical machines since they could work as trapped-field magnets. Most experiments with these stacks use pieces of tapes with relatively small areas as wider tapes are more difficult to acquire, therefore in this paper we investigate substitutions for these wider tapes to be implemented in superconducting electrical machines. With different stack architectures and substrate materials made by SuperOx, AMSC and THEVA, the magnetizing effect using pulse field magnetization (PFM) would be different. To explore the differences of this effect, sectioned stacks are tested in a modified synchronous machine designed by ASuMED under liquid nitrogen conditions. By changing different sectioned stacks of tape and testing them under the same condition, the characteristics of the trapped flux, magnetization and demagnetization could be affected, different stacks are simulated with COMSOL finite element models using an electromagnetic-thermal coupled model, and different stacks are tested with different charging voltages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据