4.7 Article

Ultra-Thinned Metasurface-Embedded Smartphone Antenna-in-Package for Millimeter-Wave 5G/6G Coverage Enhancement

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 7766-7781

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2023.3301733

关键词

5G; antenna-in-package (AiP); beam-forming IC; low-profile; metasurface; millimeter-wave (mm-wave) array antenna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a ultra-thinned metasurface-cased antenna-in-package (MCAiP) for a mm-wave 5G smartphone is presented. The MCAiP achieves a wide return-loss bandwidth and high gain, while the metasurface enhances the beam coverage of the antenna.
In this study, we present a ultra-thinned metasurface-cased antenna-in-package (MCAiP) for a millimeter-wave (mm-wave) 5G smartphone that operates in the n257 and n258 bands of FR2 (26.5-29.5, 24.25-27.5 GHz). The proposed MCAiP consists of 1 x 4 array patch antennas, inductively loaded metasurface (ILM), a smartphone cover case made on Gorilla Glass 6 (a commonly used material), and four-channel beamforming IC; it has a thin profile of 1.63 mm, making it suitable for insertion into an actual smartphone. To validate the effectiveness of commercializing the proposed MCAiP, all the structures were fabricated using a 12-layer PCB stack-up process, and beam tilting measurement was performed using four-channel beamforming IC. The proposed AiP accomplishes a 10-dB return-loss bandwidth of 23.5-32.2 GHz and a maximum gain of 13.62 dBi. In addition, we combined the four-channel beamforming IC with a metasurface-cased antenna and conducted beam tilting measurements using the all-in-one device. The peak effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) [dBm]/tilting degree [(degrees)] of the proposed MCAiP with an IC are 6.59/0, 5.87/12, and 3.37/27. Conversely, the beam tilting results of a nonmetasurface AiP with an IC are 2.01/0, 1.6/12, and -0.95/30. These results demonstrate that the metasurface enhances the beam coverage of the antenna.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据