4.7 Article

Circularly Polarized Leaky Wave Array With Wide Axial Ratio Beamwidth and Low Sidelobe

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 8272-8277

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2023.3291789

关键词

Circular polarization; leaky wave antenna (LWA); low sidelobe level (SLL); square patch; substrate integrated waveguide (SIW)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a circularly polarized leaky wave antenna array with a wide 3 dB axial ratio beamwidth and low sidelobe level. By introducing an improved CP LWA element, the stable spatial phase difference between the orthogonal polarizations and good CP radiation are achieved. A ten-element CP linear array prototype is designed using Taylor pattern synthesis, achieving a wide beamwidth and low sidelobe levels.
In this communication, a circularly polarized (CP) leaky wave antenna (LWA) array with a wide 3 dB axial ratio (AR) beamwidth and low sidelobe level (SLL) is presented. To overcome the shortage of narrow 3 dB AR beamwidth of conventional substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) slot element, an improved CP LWA element is introduced by placing a square patch above the perpendicular slots. The composite radiation mode of the new element has a stable spatial phase difference between the orthogonal polarizations within a wide range of angles, which ensures the wide 3 dB AR beamwidth and the theoretical analysis validates it. Furthermore, by adjusting the size of the proposed LWA element, it is feasible to control the leakage constant while maintaining good CP radiation, which is beneficial for low SLL pattern synthesis. By using Taylor pattern synthesis, a ten-element CP linear array prototype is designed, fabricated, and measured. At the center frequency of 14.2 GHz, the wide 3 dB AR beamwidth of 113(degrees) and low SLL of -20.9 dB are realized. Within the measured effective operation band of 13.9-14.6 GHz, the peak gain is 16.1 dBi with gain variation less than 0.6 dB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据