4.7 Article

Cost-Effective and Efficient Solutions for the Assessment and Practice of Upper Extremity Motor Performance

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 19, 页码 23494-23499

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3303892

关键词

Accuracy calibration; depth cameras; leap motion; MediaPipe; motor rehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of new technologies in motor rehabilitation aims to improve movements and functions, particularly in rehabilitating the upper extremity. This research presents two accurate, robust, and easy-to-use technological solutions for assessments and treatments, providing real-time information to enhance the field of motor rehabilitation.
The use of new technologies in the field of motor rehabilitation aims to improve both movements and functions. Specifically, such use is important in rehabilitating the upper extremity (UE) because UE motor impairment is a common disabling factor with unsatisfactory rehab results that reduce the patient's quality of life. The existing technological means for assessment and practice in the clinical field are generally based on expensive and cumbersome systems. This work presents accurate, robust, and easy-to-operate two new possible technological solutions for assessments and treatments. These solutions enable receiving accurate real-time information regarding motor performance which is essential for assessment and practice in motor rehabilitation for the patient and the therapist. The first is based on depth programming cameras. A depth camera can give accurate high-speed 3-D information of the hand movements of up to 100 frames/s. The second is based on the use of a cheap, easy-to-use webcam found in every modern laptop. Utilizing these features, we were able to perform some classic research paradigms that relate to the motor domain of the UE. Results indicate that using the proposed technological means could significantly enhance the field of motor rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据