4.2 Article

Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow in Large-Scale Electric Transmission Systems through a Matheuristic Solution Approach

期刊

IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 1132-1143

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2023.10255444

关键词

Costs; Transformers; Shunts (electrical); Reactive power; Power generation; Mathematical models; Solar power generation; Matheuristic; multi-objective optimization; probabilistic optimal power flow; VND heuristic approach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new optimization methodology to solve the AC optimal power flow problem considering renewable energy sources. It minimizes power generation costs and gas emissions by controlling power dispatch generators, adjusting transformer positions, and using controllable reactive shunt compensation. The proposed algorithm combines a mathematical model and a metaheuristic algorithm to efficiently solve the problem, and its potential is demonstrated through numerical experiments.
This paper proposes a new optimization methodology to solve the AC optimal power flow (OPF) problem considering renewable energy sources (RES). The formulation of the OPF problem comprises the minimization of power generation costs and gas emissions considering a set of operational and physical constraints. This minimization is achieved through controlling power dispatch generators, position changing of the tap transformers, and controllable reactive shunt compensation. RES and demand uncertainties are modeled using the (2m+1) point-estimate method. The mathematical formulation of the OPF problem is a mixed-integer nonlinear programming multiobjective model. A matheuristic algorithm is proposed to solve this problem efficiently, combining a classic nonlinear OPF model and the Variable Neighborhood Descent (VND) metaheuristic algorithm. The potential of the proposed algorithm is shown through numerical experiments carried out using the IEEE 300-bus systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据