4.6 Article

Longfin squid reproductive behaviours and spawning withstand wind farm pile driving noise

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsad117

关键词

aggression; anthropogenic noise; cephalopod; marine invertebrate; mating; offshore wind

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pile driving noise from offshore wind farm construction has no significant effects on the reproductive behaviors of the short-lived squid species Doryteuthis pealeii. These squid species are resilient to this pervasive environmental stressor, suggesting that behavioral context plays a role in their responses to windfarm noise. While non-reproductive behaviors can be disturbed, species with limited opportunity to reproduce can tolerate intense stressors to secure reproductive success.
Pile driving noise is an intense, repetitive, far-reaching sound that is increasing in many coastal habitats as the offshore wind energy industry expands globally. There is concern for its impacts on keystone species and vital fisheries taxa such as squids. In controlled laboratory conditions, we investigated whether exposure to pile driving noise from offshore wind farm construction altered reproductive behaviours in the short-lived semelparous species Doryteuthis pealeii. Pile driving noise had no significant effects on the occurrence rates of agonistic behaviours, mate guarding, mating, and egg laying, compared with silent control trials. The results contrast starkly with behavioural response rates of the same squid species during feeding and shoaling. The data suggest that squid reproductive behaviours may be resilient to this increasingly pervasive environmental stressor, and that behavioural context guides responses to windfarm noise for this invertebrate taxon. While some non-reproductive behaviours can clearly be disturbed, the results show that species with limited opportunity to reproduce can tolerate intense stressors to secure reproductive success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据