4.7 Article

Effect of mechano-chemical activation with NaF on improved acid leaching of vanadium-bearing shale

期刊

HYDROMETALLURGY
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106126

关键词

Vanadium-bearing shale; Mechano-chemical activation; Solubilization; Leaching

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, the extraction of vanadium from vanadium-bearing shale by direct acid leaching is inefficient due to the insufficient release of vanadium from mica, which requires a large amount of acid. To improve this, a mechano-chemical activation-assisted acid-leaching process was developed in this study. The study examined the effects of mechano-chemical activation parameters on vanadium dissolution in an acid system. The conditions used increased the vanadium leaching efficiency from 82.3% to 90.3%.
Vanadium extraction from vanadium-bearing shale by direct acid leaching is currently restricted owing to the inefficient release of vanadium from mica, which consumes a large amount of acid. To overcome this limitation, this study developed a mechano-chemical activation-assisted acid-leaching process. Further, the effects of the mechano-chemical activation parameters on the vanadium-bearing shale and vanadium dissolution in an acid system were examined using the following conditions: ball-to-pulp ratio: 50 to 1, pulp density: 50%, NaF acti-vator: 5 wt%, activation time: 30 min, sulfuric acid concentration: 12 vol%, leaching time: 6 h, leaching tem-perature: 95 degrees C. These conditions increased the vanadium leaching efficiency from 82.3% to 90.3%. The mechano-chemical activation treatment exposed the fresh muscovite surface, promoting the preferential adsorption of fluoride to form stable Si-F and Al-F bonds. This behavior induced a beneficial reaction surface on muscovite with a low energy barrier for subsequent leaching. During the leaching process, the weakened Si-O and Al-O bonds could be more easily broken by H+ attack, thus accelerating muscovite dissolution and boosting the vanadium leaching efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据