期刊
HEALTH POLICY
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104889
关键词
Artificial Intelligence (AI); Health information technology; eHealth; Evidence; Evaluation
Despite the renewed interest in AI-CDS, there is a lack of empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness, highlighting the need for rigorous evaluation and monitoring of health information technology. Assessment of design, implementation, and adoption contexts, prioritizing ethics and outcomes, and incorporating these dimensions in decision-making are crucial for successful implementation and optimization of benefits.
Despite the renewed interest in Artificial Intelligence-based clinical decision support systems (AI-CDS), there is still a lack of empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness. This underscores the need for rigorous and continuous evaluation and monitoring of processes and outcomes associated with the introduction of health information technology. We illustrate how the emergence of AI-CDS has helped to bring to the fore the critical importance of evaluation principles and action regarding all health information technology applications, as these hitherto have received limited attention. Key aspects include assessment of design, implementation and adoption contexts; ensuring systems support and optimise human performance (which in turn requires understanding clinical and system logics); and ensuring that design of systems prioritises ethics, equity, effectiveness, and outcomes. Going forward, information technology strategy, implementation and assessment need to actively incorporate these dimensions. International policy makers, regulators and strategic decision makers in implementing organisations therefore need to be cognisant of these aspects and incorporate them in decision-making and in prioritising investment. In particular, the emphasis needs to be on stronger and more evidence-based evaluation surrounding system limitations and risks as well as optimisation of outcomes, whilst ensuring learning and contextual review. Otherwise, there is a risk that applications will be sub-optimally embodied in health systems with unintended consequences and without yielding intended benefits.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据