3.9 Article

Guiding Post-Hospital Recovery by ' What Matters:' Implementation of Patient Priorities Identification in a VA Community Living Center

期刊

GERIATRICS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics8040074

关键词

geriatrics; medical decision making; age-friendly health system; quality improvement; VA health system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the feasibility and quality of the health priorities identification (HPI) process in VA Community Living Centers (CLC), and found that HPI is an acceptable and feasible approach for aligning care with patient priorities in a CLC setting.
Background: Patient priorities care (PPC) is an effective age-friendly health systems (AFHS) approach to aligning care with goals derived from ' what matters '. The purpose of this quality improvement program was to evaluate the fidelity and feasibility of the health priorities identification (HPI) process in VA Community Living Centers (CLC). Methods: PPC experts worked with local CLC staff to guide the integration of HPI into the CLC and utilized a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model for this quality improvement project. PPC experts reviewed health priorities identification (HPI) encounters and interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings for fidelity to the HPI process of PPC. Qualitative interviews with local CLC staff determined the appropriateness of the health priorities identification process in the CLC. Results: Over 8 months, nine facilitators completed twenty HPI encounters. Development of a Patient Health Priorities note template, staff education and PPC facilitator training improved fidelity and documentation of HPI encounters in the electronic health record. Facilitator interviews suggested that PPC is appropriate in this setting, not burdensome to staff and fostered a person-centered approach to AFHS. Conclusions: The HPI process is an acceptable and feasible approach to ask the ' what matters ' component of AFHS in a CLC setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据