4.7 Article

Asymmetrical Modulation of the Relationship Between the Western Pacific Pattern and El Nino-Southern Oscillation by the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation in the Boreal Winter

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 50, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2023GL103356

关键词

ENSO; the western Pacific pattern; Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation; asymmetrical modulation; tropical western north Pacific; atmospheric convection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) asymmetrically modulates the relationship between El Nino and the Western Pacific pattern (WP). The modulatory effect is significant during the negative AMO phase, but weak during the positive AMO phase. The relationship between La Nina and WP, however, is independent of AMO modulation. Furthermore, stronger El Nino amplitudes during the negative AMO period have a more significant effect on WP due to stronger atmospheric convection anomalies over the tropical western North Pacific.
Tropical atmospheric convection generated by the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) plays a crucial role in affecting the western Pacific pattern (WP) in the boreal winter by triggering an atmospheric teleconnection. Here we show from analysis of observations and model simulations that the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) asymmetrically modulates the relationship between ENSO and WP. We find a significant modulatory effect of AMO on the relationship between wintertime El Nino and WP. A robust El Nino-WP relation can be attributed to the negative AMO phase (-AMO), yet a weak relationship during the positive AMO phase (+AMO). In contrast, the relationship between La Nina and WP is independent of AMO modulation. Furthermore, during the -AMO period, stronger El Nino amplitudes lead to stronger atmospheric convection anomalies over the tropical western North Pacific, which excites stronger atmospheric teleconnection and thus has a more significant effect on WP than during the +AMO period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据