4.7 Article

Extreme Altitudes of Stratospheric Hydration by Midlatitude Convection Observed During the DCOTSS Field Campaign

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 50, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2023GL104914

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concentration of water vapor in the lower stratosphere is the most sensitive factor contributing to Earth's radiative forcing. Rapid increases in stratospheric water vapor are often caused by tropopause-overshooting convection. This study focuses on obtaining in situ observations of stratospheric air affected by recent convection over the United States. The findings show that convective hydration routinely affects the stratosphere, with records of previous heights of convective hydration being exceeded during the DCOTSS flights. The most extreme event observed indicates a 26% increase in stratospheric water vapor at an altitude of 19.25 km, a potential temperature of 463 K, and an ozone mixing ratio >1500 ppbv.
Water vapor's contribution to Earth's radiative forcing is most sensitive to changes in its lower stratosphere concentration. One recognized pathway for rapid increases in stratospheric water vapor is tropopause-overshooting convection. Since this pathway has been rarely sampled, the NASA Dynamics and Chemistry of the Summer Stratosphere (DCOTSS) field project focused on obtaining in situ observations of stratospheric air recently affected by convection over the United States. This study reports on the extreme altitudes to which convective hydration was observed. The data show that the overworld stratosphere is routinely hydrated by convection and that past documented records of stratospheric heights of convective hydration were exceeded during several DCOTSS flights. The most extreme event sampled is highlighted, for which stratospheric water vapor was increased by up to 26% at an altitude of 19.25 km, a potential temperature of 463 K, and an ozone mixing ratio >1500 ppbv.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据