4.7 Article

Extreme Precipitation-Temperature Scaling in California: The Role of Atmospheric Rivers

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 50, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2023GL104606

关键词

extreme precipitation; atmospheric rivers; temperature; climate change; Clausius-Clapeyron relationship; California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sensitivity of AR-induced precipitation to climate change is primarily driven by increases in atmospheric water vapor with warming. This study examines the scaling rates of extreme precipitation with temperature for AR and non-AR events in California using multiple statistical models. The results show that the regional scaling rates for ARs are consistently larger than non-ARs, especially for hourly event maxima. This difference in scaling rates can be explained by the fact that ARs remain near saturated and exhibit more lift and a stronger increase in specific humidity aloft with warming compared to non-ARs.
The sensitivity of atmospheric river (AR)-induced precipitation to climate change is primarily driven by increases in atmospheric water vapor with warming. However, the rate at which AR-based precipitation intensifies with warming and whether this rate differs from non-AR events remains uncertain. This work uses multiple statistical models to estimate regional, extreme precipitation-temperature scaling rates in California for AR and non-AR events. Scaling rates are determined using cold-season daily and hourly precipitation, along with multiple temperature variables to assess robustness of the results. We find that regional scaling rates for ARs are consistently larger than non-ARs, especially for hourly event maxima (posterior median scale rates of 5.7% and 2.4% per & DEG;C for ARs and non-ARs, respectively). ARs remain near saturated (i.e., high relative humidity) and exhibit more lift and a stronger increase in specific humidity aloft with warming as compared to non-ARs, helping to explain the difference in precipitation-temperature scaling rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据