4.7 Article

Controls on upstream-migrating bed forms in sandy submarine channels

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G51385.1

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Submarine channels, like river channels, have the ability to transport sediment. However, their sediment transport and bed-form development are not well understood. A depth-resolved numerical model was used to test the role of flow parameters in controlling the formation of bed forms in submarine channels. It was found that the concentration of sediment in turbidity currents is the strongest predictor of upstream-migrating bed-form formation.
Submarine channels parallel river channels in their ability to transport sediment. However, in contrast to rivers, sediment transport and bed-form development in submarine channels are less well understood. Many steep (>1(degrees)), sandy submarine channels are dominated by up-stream-migrating bed forms. The flow conditions required to form these upstream-migrating bed forms remain debated because the interactions between turbidity currents and active bed forms are difficult to measure directly. Consequently, we used a depth-resolved numerical model to test the role of flow parameters that are hypothesized to control the formation of upstream-migrating bed forms in submarine channels. While our modeling results confirmed the importance of previously identified flow parameters (e.g., densiometric Froude number), we found that basal sediment concentration in turbidity currents is the strongest predictor of upstream-migrating bed-form formation. Our model shows how locally steep gradients enable high sediment concentrations (average >5 vol%) in the basal parts of flows, which allow the development of cyclic step instabilities and their associated bed forms. This new insight explains the previously puzzling observation that upstream-migrating bed forms are abundant in proximal, steep, sandy reaches of submarine channels, while their occurrence becomes more intermittent downslope.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据