4.2 Article

Past beaked whale diversity in the North Sea: reappraisal through a new Miocene record and biostratigraphic analyses

期刊

GEOLOGICA BELGICA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

Geologica Belgica Luxemburga Scientia & Professionis
DOI: 10.20341/gb.2023.009

关键词

Cetacea; Ziphiidae; fossil; palynology; Serravallian; Tortonian; radiation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes a new ziphiid cranium from Antwerp, Belgium, which enriches the fossil record of ziphiids in the Neogene of this area. By analyzing other fossil specimens, the chronostratigraphic ranges of ziphiid species are improved, and a Late Miocene radiation of ziphiids is suggested, possibly related to the decline of certain dolphin clades.
Extant beaked whales (family Ziphiidae) are deep diving suction feeders and none of them can be considered as a permanent resident of the shallow southern North Sea. The rich fossil record of ziphiids from Neogene deposits of this area is thus surprising. However, chronostratigraphic intervals of most recorded taxa remain poorly constrained, preventing from assessing the evolution of their local diversity. In this work, we describe a new ziphiid cranium from the Neogene of Antwerp (north of Belgium), which is attributed to Caviziphius aff. C. altirostris. Sediment samples were extracted from 15 fossil ziphiid cranial remains from this area (including the one described herein), referred to eight species. The samples were analysed for their palynological content, leading to improved chronostratigraphic ranges for several species. Seven to eight ziphiid species from the southern North Sea, all from the Messapicetus clade, are proposed to originate from a Serravallian to Tortonian (late Middle to early Late Miocene) interval, and three to six more precisely from the mid-to late Tortonian. Added to the fossil record of other regions, these results point to a Late Miocene radiation of members of the Messapicetus clade, possibly related to the synchronous worldwide decline of several hyper-longirostrine dolphin clades.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据