4.6 Article

Genome sequencing detects a wide range of clinically relevant copy-number variants and other genomic alterations

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.101006

关键词

bioinformatic pipeline; clinical genome sequencing; copy-number variant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used genome sequencing to detect a wide range of copy-number variants (CNVs) and other non-single nucleotide variant/indel variant types. These genetic alterations accounted for 15.8% of reported variants, with deletions being the most common type. The study also found that additional genetic tests were ordered in some cases, but failed to report the variants detected by genome sequencing.
Purpose: Copy-number variants (CNVs) and other non-single nucleotide variant/indel variant types contribute an important proportion of diagnoses in individuals with suspected genetic disease. This study describes the range of such variants detected by genome sequencing (GS).Methods: For a pediatric cohort of 1032 participants undergoing clinical GS, we characterize the CNVs and other non-single nucleotide variant/indel variant types that were reported, including aneuploidies, mobile element insertions, and uniparental disomies, and we describe the bioinformatic pipeline used to detect these variants.Results: Together, these genetic alterations accounted for 15.8% of reported variants. Notably, 67.9% of these were deletions, 32.9% of which overlapped a single gene, and many deletions were reported together with a second variant in the same gene in cases of recessive disease. A retrospective medical record review in a subset of this cohort revealed that up to 6 additional genetic tests were ordered in 68% (26/38) of cases, some of which failed to report the CNVs/rare variants reported on GS.Conclusion: GS detected a broad range of reported variant types, including CNVs ranging in size from 1 Kb to 46 Mb.(c) 2023 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据