4.1 Review

Approaches to increase the validity of gene family identification using manual homology search tools

期刊

GENETICA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-023-00196-8

关键词

Gene family identification; Homology; Genome analysis; Sequence similarity; Sequence evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying homologs is crucial for analyzing genetic patterns and evolutionary relationships among species. Manual pipelines are commonly used for identifying small gene families accurately. However, issues with homology searches can affect the validity of the analysis. This article proposes several approaches to mitigate these issues.
Identifying homologs is an important process in the analysis of genetic patterns underlying traits and evolutionary relationships among species. Analysis of gene families is often used to form and support hypotheses on genetic patterns such as gene presence, absence, or functional divergence which underlie traits examined in functional studies. These analyses often require precise identification of all members in a targeted gene family. Manual pipelines where homology search and orthology assignment tools are used separately are the most common approach for identifying small gene families where accurate identification of all members is important. The ability to curate sequences between steps in manual pipelines allows for simple and precise identification of all possible gene family members. However, the validity of such manual pipeline analyses is often decreased by inappropriate approaches to homology searches including too relaxed or stringent statistical thresholds, inappropriate query sequences, homology classification based on sequence similarity alone, and low-quality proteome or genome sequences. In this article, we propose several approaches to mitigate these issues and allow for precise identification of gene family members and support for hypotheses linking genetic patterns to functional traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据