4.7 Review

CST-Pola/Primase: the second telomere maintenance machine

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 37, 期 13-14, 页码 555-569

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.350479.123

关键词

CST; telomerase; telomere

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this review, the authors discuss the role of the CST-Polα/Primase complex in telomere length regulation. They highlight that this complex not only functions in strand synthesis but also controls telomerase to maintain telomere length. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of this complex in preventing telomeric disorders by replenishing lost sequences and determining telomere length.
In this review, Cai and de Lange discuss the role of the CST-Pol & alpha;/Primase complex in telomere length regulation. Providing insight into its structure, evolution, and molecular interactions, they illustrate that CST-Pol & alpha;/Primase not only effectuates fill-in strand synthesis but also controls telomerase to maintain telomere length, while genetic perturbations in its components result in telomeric disorders. It has been known for decades that telomerase extends the 3 & PRIME; end of linear eukaryotic chromosomes and dictates the telomeric repeat sequence based on the template in its RNA. However, telomerase does not mitigate sequence loss at the 5 & PRIME; ends of chromosomes, which results from lagging strand DNA synthesis and nucleolytic processing. Therefore, a second enzyme is needed to keep telomeres intact: DNA polymerase & alpha;/Primase bound to Ctc1-Stn1-Ten1 (CST). CST-Pol & alpha;/Primase maintains telomeres through a fill-in reaction that replenishes the lost sequences at the 5 & PRIME; ends. CST not only serves to maintain telomeres but also determines their length by keeping telomerase from overelongating telomeres. Here we discuss recent data on the evolution, structure, function, and recruitment of mammalian CST-Pol & alpha;/Primase, highlighting the role of this complex and telomere length control in human disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据