4.5 Article

Evaluation of lumbar and hip movement characterization and muscle activities during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.021

关键词

Knee osteoarthritis; Gait analysis; Hip limitation; Hyperlordotic lumbar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the differences in lumbar and hip movements during gait and muscle activities related to knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients and healthy participants. The results showed that KOA patients used a hyperlordotic lumbar and hip flexed strategy, leading to excessive stress on the lower extremity joints during gait.
Patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) might have gait deviations, but few previous studies have discussed gait compensatory movements of the proximal and distal parts of muscle groups related to KOA. The study aimed to measure lumbar and hip movements during gait test and collect muscle activities of the lower extremities. Thirty-four participants with KOA and 28 healthy participants aged over 50 years were recruited for this study. Lumbar and hip motions during walking test were measured using inertial measurement units. Four muscle groups of the lower extremity (erector spinae, gluteus maximus, quadriceps muscle, and gastrocnemius) activities in gait were collected using surface EMGs. KOA patients used an 2.12 circle anterior inclined lumbar spine (p = 0.007) and 22.94 circle flexed hip (p = 0.001) in gait compared to healthy participants. The KOA patients had a small hip movement range 30.19 circle(p = 0.001) and a higher asymmetric stance time ratio 0.39 (p = 0.006). Patients with KOA showed decreased erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation and increased activation of the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles during gait. In conclusion, patients with KOA used a hyperlordotic lumbar and hip flexed strategy, which overactivates distal extensor muscles through the whole gait and might cause overstress on the lower extremity joints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据