4.4 Review

ITS alchemy: On the use of ITS as a DNA marker in fungal ecology

期刊

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101274

关键词

Internal transcribed spacer; ITS; Fungi; Metabarcoding; Community ecology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This text discusses the inherent limitations of using the rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region as a DNA barcode marker in fungal ecology studies. It highlights the challenges in species delimitation, the lack of significant interspecific divergence, and the uncertainty in species-level taxonomy. It also emphasizes the complexity and variation introduced by PCR and sequencing errors in DNA metabarcoding data. The importance of the ITS region as a general DNA (meta)barcoding marker for fungi is acknowledged but caution against naïve or simplistic use is stressed.
High throughput sequencing of PCR amplicons derived from environmental DNA (aka DNA metabarcoding) has become an integral part of fungal ecology, enabling in-depth characterization of fungal communities. In most cases, the rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region, which has a long history as a target in fungal systematics, is used as a DNA barcode marker. Despite improvements in sequencing techniques and bioinformatics approaches, there are inherent limitations associated with the use of a single-locus DNA marker that are often ignored. In this text, I discuss both inherent biological and methodological limitations associated with the use of the ITS marker. For example, proper species delimitation is often not possible with a single marker, and a sig-nificant DNA barcoding gap (i.e. interspecific divergence) is often missing between sister taxa in ITS. Further, we can rarely be fully confident about the assigned species-level taxonomy based on available reference sequences. In addition to the inherent limitations, an extra layer of complexity and variation is blended into DNA meta-barcoding data due to PCR and sequencing errors that may look similar to natural molecular variation. The bioinformatics processing of ITS amplicons must take into account both the basic properties of the ITS region, as well as the generated errors and biases. In this regard, we cannot adopt approaches and settings from other markers, such as 16S and 18S, blindly. For example, due to intraspecific variability in the ITS region, and sometimes intragenomic variability, ITS sequences must be clustered to approach species level resolution in community studies. Therefore, I argue that the concept of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) is not applicable. Although the ITS region is by far the best option as a general DNA (meta)barcoding marker for fungi, this contribution is meant to remind against a naive or simplistic use of the ITS region, and for stimulating further discussions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据