4.7 Article

Skill rather than beak kinematics affects seed handling performance in a granivorous songbird

期刊

FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14402

关键词

beak kinematics; feeding performance; feeding skills; granivory; individual variation; songbirds

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through experimental research on canaries, it was found that accurate seed positioning is crucial for efficiency improvement and reducing feeding time, while the speed, acceleration, and frequency of the beak have little relationship with food handling performance.
1. In granivorous songbirds, feeding is a complex process as seeds need to be dehusked before they can be consumed, making the feeding act a biomechanically challenging endeavour. However, most previous research has focused on how beak morphology affects feeding performance, while the influences of beak kinematics remain largely unknown.2. In this study, we hence investigated at the individual level how feeding performance (i.e. seed processing time and success rate) relates to both beak kinematics (i.e. beak tip speed, acceleration, frequency) and skill (i.e. seed handling tactics and cracking techniques) in the Canary Serinus canaria. To do so, high-speed videos during feeding were recorded and subjected to automated tracking of beak tip movements.3. Better skills, that is accurate positioning of the seed for being split in half, reduced total seed handling time compared to more random positioning and crushing the husk into multiple, scattering fragments. Surprisingly, individual variation in beak speed, acceleration or frequency generally did not relate to differences in performance.4. Thus, our data suggest that seed positioning precision, and hence the control of coordinated beak and tongue movement, is critical to minimize feeding durations in songbirds. Further studies are needed to explore whether this develops via a positive feedback between behaviour, learning and increased efficiency or if it relates to intrinsic differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据