4.7 Article

Preparation adjacent Ni-Co bimetallic nano catalyst for dry reforming of methane

期刊

FUEL
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128013

关键词

Catalytic reforming of methane; NiCo bimetallic; Microemulsion; Stably and efficiently

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic reforming for hydrogen production is important for sustainable energy, but coking is a challenge for industrialization. The key is to balance the formation rate of *C and *O. A novel preparation strategy of Ni-Co nano alloy catalysts was proposed, leading to highly dispersed nanoparticles. The bimetallic 5Ni5Co/SiO2 nano alloy catalyst showed the best catalytic activity, with stable performance and improved anti-coking properties.
Catalytic reforming for hydrogen production is a bridge to sustainable energy. Coking is a big challenge for the industrialization of DRM. The key is to maintain a balance between the formation rate of *C and that of *O. A novel preparation strategy of Ni-Co nano alloy catalysts was proposed with microemulsion coupling with anti -solvent extraction strategy. The prepared nanoparticles were highly dispersed and Ni,Co were closely adjacent. Compared with the monometallic 10Ni0Co/SiO2 catalyst and 0Ni10Co/SiO2 catalyst, the as-prepared bimetallic 5Ni5Co/SiO2 nano alloy catalyst showed the best catalytic activity. On the monometallic 10Ni0Co/SiO2 catalyst, owing to the faster cracking of methane on Ni particles, the catalytic activity decreased 10% by coking during the 50 h test. However, 0Ni10Co/SiO2 catalyst was deactivated by the oxidation of Co. In the 100 h test of 5Ni5Co/ SiO2 bimetallic catalyst, the catalytic activity remained stable. TPSR showed that the dissociation of methane and the generation of *C was slightly inhibited and the activation of CO2 was intensified. More activated *O enhanced the reaction of *C or *CHx and *O. The anti-coking performance was improved. The results provide implications for anti-coking catalysts for catalytic reforming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据