4.7 Article

Unveiling the CeO2 morphology effect in Pd-CeO2/C heterostructures catalysts for formic acid dehydrogenation

期刊

FUEL
卷 346, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128333

关键词

Formic acid; Dehydrogenation; CeO2 morphology; Heterostructure catalysts; Structure-activity relationship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CeO2 nanoparticles were found to enhance the catalytic activity in formic acid dehydrogenation, with CeO2 (110) surface and oxygen vacancies playing a key role. The addition of biomass carbon improved the dispersion of Pd-CeO2 heterostructures and increased defect density. This work provides a reasonable design and controllable synthesis strategy for the effective application of formic acid as a liquid phase hydrogen storage material.
It is very crucial but still a huge challenge to develop efficient and durable catalysts to promote hydrogen production from formic acid (FA). Herein, three CeO2 with structurally well-defined different shapes, i.e., sCeO2 (spheres), rCeO2 (rod) and oCeO2 (octahedral), are prepared, and their effect on the crystal faces and oxygen vacancy over the constructed heterostructure catalysts (Pd-CeO2/C) have been intensively investigated in the FA dehydrogenation. Pd-sCeO2/C outperforms the other catalysts with a turnover frequency (TOF) value of 2691 h-1 and selectivity to hydrogen of 100 % at 30 degrees C. A synergism between the CeO2 (1 10) facet and more oxygen vacancies is considered to be key to obtaining the high reactivity. Moreover, biomass carbon promotes the dispersion of Pd-CeO2 heterostructures due to its large specific surface area and causes more defects in the Pd-CeO2/C. Combined with in-situ FTIR and density functional theory (DFT), it is speculated that FA is decomposed through formate pathway over the Pd-sCeO2/C. This work thus provides a reasonable design and controllable synthesis strategy for the effective application of FA as an available liquid phase hydrogen storage material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据