4.5 Review

Non-Coding RNA in Cholangiocarcinoma: An Update

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2808173

关键词

cholangiocarcinoma; non-coding RNA; long non-coding RNA; circular RNA; epigenetic; competitive endogenous RNA; signaling pathways

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cholangiocarcinoma, a highly malignant tumor with increasing incidence, often diagnosed at advanced stages, requires better early diagnosis and treatment. Non-coding RNA is found to regulate the development of cholangiocarcinoma through various mechanisms, providing new insights for early diagnosis and therapeutic targeting.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is one of the most common tumors with high malignancy. Its incidence is increasing year by year, and it is insidious and easily metastasized, and most patients are already in advanced stages when they are diagnosed. Surgery is an essential treatment for CCA, but the 5-year survival rate is still unsatisfactory due to the low early diagnosis rate and high malignancy of CCA. Therefore, exploring the molecular mechanisms of CCA to find reliable biomarkers and effective therapeutic targets is essential to improve the early diagnosis and survival rate of CCA. Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) is a class of RNA without protein-coding ability, mainly including microRNA (miRNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), and circular RNA (circRNA). In recent years, numerous pieces of evidence have shown that aberrantly expressed ncRNAs can regulate the occurrence and development of CCA through various mechanisms such as mediating epigenetic, sponge miRNAs regulating the expression of target genes and participating in regulating cancer-related signaling pathways, which provides new approaches and ideas for early diagnosis, prognosis assessment and therapeutic targeting of CCA. In this paper, we review the molecular mechanisms of lncRNAs and circRNAs regulating the progression of CCA in recent years and discuss their potential clinical value in CCA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据