4.7 Article

Interfacial behavior of Mesona chinensis Benth polysaccharide at the oil-water interface and the stability of the emulsion

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108847

关键词

Mesona chinensis Benth polysaccharide; Emulsion; Emulsion stability; QCM-D; Interfacial dilatational rheology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the adsorption kinetics, viscoelasticity, resistance to external perturbation, and interfacial film properties of Mesona chinensis Benth polysaccharide (MP) were investigated. The results showed that MP formed an elastic film at the oil-water interface and the stability of MP-stabilized emulsions improved with increasing MP concentration. These findings provide a foundation for expanding the utilization of MP in the food industry.
Emulsions are commonly regarded as an important approach to improving the texture of some foods and expanding their use in food industry. Polysaccharides have been widely used as emulsifiers due to their nontoxicity, plentiful sources, and good accessibility. Mesona chinensis Benth polysaccharide (MP) which is widely used as food ingredient has many bioactivities including immunomodulatory, antioxidant activity and antiinflammatory activity, and has good emulsification. However, the interfacial behavior, emulsification stability and mechanism of MP have not been explored. In this study, the adsorption kinetics of MP, the viscoelasticity, the resistance to external perturbation, the adsorption mass and thickness of the interfacial film were measured. Moreover, the stability of MP-stabilized emulsions was evaluated by the zeta-potential, droplet size, rheology, and long-term stability. The result showed that at the oil-water interface, MP formed an elastic film. Also, as the MP concentration increased, the MP-stabilized emulsions exhibited better long-term stability. These results offer a conceptual foundation for broadening the utilization of MP in the food industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据