4.7 Article

Interfacial behavior of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) globulins at different pH: Relation to emulsion stability

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108958

关键词

Coconut globulins; pH; Interfacial adsorption; Interfacial dilatational rheology; Emulsion stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between interfacial behavior and emulsion stability of coconut globulin (CG) at different pH levels was investigated to understand its emulsification mechanism. The dynamic interfacial tension of CG was lowest at pH 11, followed by pH 9, 3, 7, and 5. CG showed the best interfacial adsorption at pH 5 but desorption at pH 11. Heating resulted in decreased adsorption for all pH groups. The dilatational elasticity modulus (Ed) of CG was highest at pH 5, followed by pH 3, 7, 9, and 11, but significantly decreased after heating.
For better understanding the emulsification mechanism of coconut globulin (CG) at different pH, the relationship between interfacial behavior and emulsion stability (O/W) of unheated and heated (90 degrees C, 30 min) CG with different pH (3-11) were investigated. The dynamic interfacial tension of CG exhibited the lowest value at pH 11, followed by pH 9, 3, 7, and 5. CG had the best interfacial adsorption at pH 5 but had an interfacial desorption at pH 11. All groups displayed decreased adsorption after heating. The CG at pH 5 had the highest dilatational elasticity modulus (Ed), followed by pH 3, 7, 9, and 11. The Ed trend of heated CG was consistent with the unheated samples but significantly decreased. Under high frequency and amplitude perturbation, the CG at pH 11 had a higher dilatational modulus (E). The CG showed a better interfacial behavior that contributed to a better emulsion stability at pH 3 whether been heated or not. The illumination of relation between interfacial behavior and emulsion stability is of great significance in promoting the application of CG as an emulsifier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据