4.7 Article

In vitro fermentation characteristics of oxidized konjac glucomannan and its modulation effects on gut microbiota

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108693

关键词

Konjac glucomannan; Oxidized degradation; Enzyme-hydrolysis; Fecal fermentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Depolymerized konjac glucomannan (KGM) prepared through oxidation and enzymehydrolysis showed better health benefits than natural KGM. The differences in chemical structure between the oxidized KGM (OKGM) and enzymehydrolyzed KGM (EKGM) influenced their fermentability and gut microbiota modulation. OKGM groups exhibited lower reducing sugar concentrations, higher residual carbohydrate contents, and higher production of acetic and propionic acids, while EKGM groups showed higher production of butyric acids. The relative abundances of certain bacteria species also differed between OKGM and EKGM groups.
Depolymerized konjac glucomannan (KGM) had better health benefits than natural KGM. Oxidation and enzymehydrolysis were two effective ways to prepare depolymerized KGM. Oxidized KGM (OKGM) and enzymehydrolyzed KGM (EKGM) varied in molecular structures, verified by nuclear magnetic resonance and atomic force microscope. The differences in chemical structure definitely influenced the fermentability of depolymerized KGM. Herein, effects of OKGM on in vitro fecal fermentation was investigated, comparing with EKGM at approximately same molecular weights. During fermentation, OKGM groups displayed slightly lower reducing sugar concentrations and higher residual carbohydrate contents than EKGM groups. After fermentation, OKGM groups produced more acetic acids and propionic acids than EKGM groups, while EKGM groups generated more butyric acids than OKGM groups. Meanwhile, relative abundances of the Firmicutes and Lactobacillus in OKGM groups were higher, while relative abundances of the Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria and Bacteroides was higher in EKGM groups. OKGM and EKGM differed in modulating gut microbiota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据