4.7 Article

Comparative investigations of various modification methods on the gelling, rheological properties and mechanism of fish gelatin

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136632

关键词

Fish gelatin; Modification; Gelling properties; Rheological behavior; Structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, κ-carrageenan (κC) and transglutaminase (TG) were used to modify fish gelatin (FG). Three types of modified gelatin groups FG-κC, FG-TG, and FG-κC-TG were prepared. Results showed that κC and κC-TG complex modification greatly enhanced the gel strength and textural properties of FG gels, while pure TG modification weakened the gelling properties. The pure 0.1% κC modified FG had the highest gel strength and hardness. Rheological behavior indicated that the complex modified FG samples had the highest viscosity, gelling points, melting points, and G'∞.
In this study, & kappa;-carrageenan(& kappa;C) and Transglutaminase (TG) were used to modify fish gelatin (FG). Three types of modified gelatin groups FG-& kappa;C, FG-TG and FG-& kappa;C-TG were prepared. The results showed that the gel strength and textural properties of FG gels were greatly enhanced by & kappa;C modification and & kappa;C-TG complex modification, whilst pure TG modification weakened the gelling properties. And the pure 0.1 % & kappa;C modified FG had the highest gel strength and hardness, respectively. Rheological behavior showed that the complex modified FG samples had the highest viscosity, gelling points, melting points and G'& INFIN;. Fourier infrared spectra and LF-NMR analysis showed that & kappa;C and & kappa;C-TG modification respectively improved the contents of hydrogen and isopeptide that decreased the water mobility but stabilized the helical structure of gelatin gels. Fluorescence intensity showed that three types of modification decreased fluorescence intensity. While, the formation of aggregates and denser gel networks decreased in vitro digestibility of FG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据