4.7 Article

Valorisation of pork by-products to obtain antioxidant and antihypertensive peptides

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 423, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136351

关键词

Meat by-products; Porcine liver; Autolysis; Proteolysis; Bioactive peptides; Peptidomic; Endogenous enzymes (proteases)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porcine liver can be used for extracting zinc-protoporphyrin (ZnPP) as a natural red meat pigment. In this study, porcine liver homogenates were incubated at pH 4.8 and 45 degrees C under anaerobic conditions to obtain insoluble ZnPP. The molecular weight distributions of the porcine liver fractions at pH 4.8 and pH 7.5 were similar, but the fractions obtained at pH 4.8 had higher abundance of eight essential amino acids. The results demonstrate the potential of porcine liver in extracting natural pigments and bioactive peptides.
The porcine liver could be used for the extraction of zinc-protoporphyrin (ZnPP) as a natural red meat pigment. During the autolysis process, porcine liver homogenates was incubated at pH 4.8 and 45 degrees C under anaerobic conditions to obtain insoluble ZnPP. After incubation, the homogenates were readjusted at pH 4.8, and at pH 7.5 before being centrifuged at 5500 x g for 20 min at 4 degrees C and the resulting supernatant were compared with the obtained at pH 4.8 at the beginning of the incubation. The molecular weight distributions of the porcine liver fractions at both pHs were very similar, however, eight essential amino acids were more abundant in fractions obtained at pH 4.8. Regarding the ORAC assay, porcine liver protein fraction at pH 4.8 showed the highest antioxidant capacity but antihypertensive inhibition was similar for both pHs. Peptides with strong bioactivity potential from aldehyde dehydrogenase, lactoylglutathione lyase, SEC14-like protein 3 and others were identi-fied. The findings have demonstrated the potential of the porcine liver to extract natural pigments and bioactive peptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据