4.7 Article

Different interactions between Tartary buckwheat protein and Tartary buckwheat phenols during extraction: Alterations in the conformation and antioxidant activity of protein

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 418, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135711

关键词

Buckwheat protein; Phenols; Structure; Antioxidant activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the interaction between buckwheat protein and buckwheat phenols during protein extraction, and compares the effects of phenols on protein structure and antioxidant activity. The content of total phenol increased as the extraction time extended. Four phenols and seven phenols were identified as binding to proteins in non-covalent and covalent forms, respectively. The binding of phenols affected protein structure, fluorescence intensity, and surface hydrophobicity, and also reduced the free amino and sulfhydryl content of proteins. These findings provide valuable information for the preparation of protein-phenol complexes.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the interaction between buckwheat protein and buckwheat phenols in the process of protein extraction and to compare the effects of phenols on protein structure and antioxidant activity. With the extension of extraction time, the content of total phenol increased from 150.51 to 336.01 mg gallic acid equivalent/g sample. Four phenols and seven phenols were identified by UPLC-Q/TOF-MS as binding to proteins in non-covalent and covalent forms, respectively. The contribution of non-covalent and covalent bound phenols to the antioxidant activity of the complexes were different. Meanwhile, the binding of phenols changed the infrared characteristic peak of protein, and reduced the fluorescence intensity and surface hydrophobic value. The free amino and sulfhydryl content of the protein decreased with increasing extraction time. These findings provide valuable information for one-step preparation of protein-phenol complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据