4.7 Article

Dual-signal fluorescent test strips for spoilage sensing of packaged seafood: Visual monitoring of volatile basic nitrogens

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 416, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135725

关键词

Metal nanoclusters; Ratiometric fluorescent test strip; VBNs; Food freshness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exploring reliable and efficient methods for evaluating food safety is crucial due to the food safety issues. In this study, a ratiometric test strip using D-penicillamine capped silver nanoclusters (DPA-AgNCs) and bimetallic gold/silver nanoclusters (AuAgNCs) was proposed as a real-time and visual monitoring system for food freshness. The developed test strip showed good response and sensitivity for volatile basic nitrogens (VBNs), with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.51 mu M and 0.08 ppm for spermidine and ammonia hydroxide, respectively. It was successfully applied for non-contact and visual evaluating and monitoring VBNs in shrimp samples.
With the food safety issues abounding, exploring reliable and efficient methods for evaluating food safety is crucial. Herein, a ratiometric test strip was proposed by using green-yellow fluorescent D-penicillamine capped silver nanocluster (DPA-AgNCs) as indicator and red-emitting bimetallic gold/silver nanoclusters (AuAgNCs) as an internal reference, providing a real-time and visual monitoring system for food freshness. Results showed that the as-prepared DPA-AgNCs displayed an excellent response and good sensitivity for volatile basic nitrogens (VBNs), with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.51 mu M and 0.08 ppm for spermidine and ammonia hydroxide, respectively. Subsequently, a ratiometric test strip was developed to visually monitor ammonia vapour, dis-playing an obvious fluorescence colour variation from mustard to deep-red. Moreover, the presented ratiometric test strip was successfully applied for non-contact and visual evaluating and monitoring VBNs in the shrimp sample, showing high potential for in-situ monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据