4.7 Article

Interfacial effects of gallate alkyl esters on physical and oxidative stability of high fat fish oil-in-water emulsions stabilized with sodium caseinate and OSA-modified starch

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135923

关键词

Interfacial activity; Phenolipids; Oxidative stability; Antioxidant partitioning; Surfactant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of sodium caseinate (SC) and its combination with OSA-modified starch (SC-OS; 1:1) on the physical and oxidative stability of high-fat fish oil-in-water emulsion were studied. The SC emulsion had smaller droplets and higher viscosity due to fast adsorption. Both emulsions exhibited non-Newtonian and shear-thinning behavior. SC emulsion showed lower lipid oxidation due to better Fe2+ chelating activity. Short-chain gallates (G1 > G0 similar to G3) in SC emulsion had a synergistic effect against lipid oxidation, while G8, G12, and G16 added emulsions showed higher lipid oxidation due to internalization.
Effects of sodium caseinate (SC) and its combination with OSA-modified starch (SC-OS; 1:1) alone and with n-alkyl gallates (C0-C18) on the physical and oxidative stability of high-fat fish oil-in-water emulsion were evaluated. SC emulsion contained the smallest droplets and highest viscosity due to the fast adsorption at droplet surfaces. Both emulsions had non-Newtonian and shear-thinning behavior. A lower accumulation of lipid hydroperoxides and volatile compounds was found in SC emulsion due to its better Fe2+ chelating activity. The incorporated short-chain gallates (G1 > G0 similar to G3) in SC emulsion had a strong synergistic effect against lipid oxidation compared to that of SC-OS emulsion. The better antioxidant efficiency of G1 can be related to its higher partition at the oil-water interface, while G0 and G3 had a higher partition into the aqueous phase. In contrast, G8, G12, and G16 added emulsions indicated higher lipid oxidation due to their internalization inside the oil droplets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据