4.7 Article

Dual role of polyglycerol vitamin E succinate in emulsions: An efficient antioxidant emulsifier

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 416, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135776

关键词

Polyglycerol; Vitamin E succinate; Nanoemulsion; TPGS; Emulsifier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel emulsifier (PG20-VES) was synthesized by attaching hydrophilic twenty-polyglycerol (PG20) to hydrophobic vitamin E succinate (VES). Compared with the widely used commercial emulsifier TPGS, PG20-VES showed a lower critical micelle concentration, lower interfacial tension, stronger emulsifying capacity, and similar antioxidant property. In vitro digestion study demonstrated that lipid droplets coated by PG20-VES were digested under simulated small intestine conditions. This study highlights the potential of PG20-VES as an efficient antioxidant emulsifier for bioactive delivery systems in various industries.
alpha-Tocopherol, as an oil-soluble vitamin with strong antioxidant activity. It is the most naturally abundant and biologically active form of vitamin E in humans. In this study, a novel emulsifier (PG20-VES) was synthesized by attaching hydrophilic twenty-polyglycerol (PG20) to hydrophobic vitamin E succinate (VES). This emulsifier was shown to have a relatively low critical micelle concentration (CMC = 3.2 mu g/mL). The antioxidant activities and emulsification properties of PG20-VES were compared with those of a widely used commercial emulsifier: D-alpha-Tocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS). PG20-VES exhibited a lower interfacial tension, stronger emulsifying capacity and similar antioxidant property to TPGS. An in vitro digestion study showed that lipid droplets coated by PG20-VES were digested under simulated small intestine conditions. This study showed that PG20-VES is an efficient antioxidant emulsifier, which may have applications in the formulation of bioactive delivery systems in the food, supplement, and pharmaceutical industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据