4.5 Article

Cumin and eucalyptus essential oil standardization using fractional distillation: Data-driven optimization and techno-economic analysis

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 90-101

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2023.10.005

关键词

Essential oil; Fractional distillation; Dynamic simulation; Cuminaldehyde; 1,8-cineole; Techno-economic analysis; Data-driven optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cumin and eucalyptus essential oils were enriched to meet ISO standards using a dynamic fractional distillation process. The optimization results showed low operating costs and potential for improving process efficiency.
Cumin and eucalyptus essential oils (EOs) are among the most important and widely used EOs with a broad range of applications in the pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food industries. The seeds and leaves of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) plants are processed with extraction techniques to retrieve their EOs, yet certain product specifications need to be met to achieve a high-quality product. Based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the essential oils of cumin and eucalyptus should contain certain amounts of cuminaldehyde and 1,8-cineole to be of acceptable quality. In this study, we design and optimize a dynamic fractional distillation process that enriches cumin and eucalyptus EOs to the ISO standards, with concentrations of 42% cuminaldehyde and 80% of 1,8-cineole achieved for each EO respectively. The dynamic model of this process is simulated via Aspen Plus using data from a pilot-scale fractional distillation unit, and the operating conditions that minimize the operational cost in the simulated environment are identified using the NOMAD algorithm. The optimization results show that the operating cost of standardization processes for cumin and eucalyptus EOs are $0.688/batch and $0.6973/batch, with process efficiencies of 69.56% and 59.77%, respectively. Furthermore, the techno-economic analysis for these two standardization processes showed that the total annualized cost was approximately $510,600 for both processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据